Sunday, July 19, 2009

Discount 20% for 80 times per month Toll payment?

What a joke. Suprise! I don't expect Najib know how to make a joke, but he is. For 80 times to take place, you must pay 4 tolls each day on everage in order to get a discount. After all, it only effective on September. Get pass through more toll booth in order to get discount? The sentence should be phrases something like this: If you pay toll more than RM80 per month, you'll get a 20% discount, which I think more practical.... Isn't it? as simple as that... Do they still think that we are dumb enough to be fooled off?

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Discrimination by BN: No oil royalty for Kelantan











As usual, since Kelantan was rule under PR, so there's no need for Petronas to channel the oil royalty to Kelantan although it was obtained from the Kelantan's shore. Everybody knows what happen in Terengganu when PAS won in 1999, the federal government under Mahathir's regime straight away turn the oil royalty into "wang ehsan" and channel it to the federal comittee (JKKP) in Terengganu instead. So, the same thing although different in term of modus operandi, the ruling is not to channel the money to the opposition, never and ever... For Kelantanese, if you want to maintain PAS as the ruling party, and at the same time need the oil royalty, you don't have a choice but to wait and contribute for PR to rule the Federal Government... Patience and commitment is the best medicine....

Friday, July 3, 2009

Dr M: Where did Petronas money go?


Even Mahathir did wonder where are those Petronas amounting RM253.6 billion money for the last 6 years spent to. The value is whoppingly increased tremendously year by year from RM19 billion in 2004 to RM67.8 billion in 2009. Oh no! what happen to our money?

Please look at the statistic and judge it... the pirate in BN is on the rise.....

Monday, June 15, 2009

Oil price: Is 30 Sen subsidy still in place?

I'm not in a position to support the Government to increase the Petrol price although the crude oil price is now reaching USD70 per barrel. What I really concern is the promise made by our Government that they will maintain the subsidy at 30 sen no matter what the oil price is. If we want to take into account that 30 sen subsidy was in place during the crude price is hovering around USD50 per barrel and the petrol price is maintaining at RM1.80 per litre.

With the crude price reaching USD70 per barrel (5 - 15 June 2009), is the 30 sen subsidy is still valid? I don't think so... the subsidy is now I think reaching almost 50 to 60 sen per litre. So, where are the promised? Looks like they are still cheating people and their promise made only to suit the situation.... Believe me.... 

Third link: Is it desperately required?

I don't know what are the hidden agenda and deal by Najib in proposing the third bridge but not to upgrade the "Tambak Johor" instead. Amazingly, you know what?, Singapore is agreed. Is Johor and Singapore are great enough as even 2 bridges linking them are still proven not enough? Why not they find a way to encourage people to use the second link instead of building another bridge after a plan to upgrade the Tambak Johor is proven futile? I smell a big fishy around there, MACC should standby by now if they got a guts...

Keranamu BN, Malaysiaku Hancur.... 

Something are wrong somewhere, but I don't know where

Today's court decision is also another blow to our constitution. The court decided that the Election Commission (EC), and not the Perak state assembly speaker, to declare whether or not a state seat is vacant. It is true that the EC is right to say that if and only if the speaker already submitted the case and if the case is submitted, of course, the seat is vacant. The speaker will not submitting the case if the seat is not vacant. The statement is true when the EC only declaring as what was passed to them by the Speaker. Of course the case will be declared by the EC not the speaker, the speaker just passing the batton to the EC for them to declare, not to decide..

The EC cannot even declare the seat is vacant if the speaker did not submitting the case, isn't it? or, can the EC declare the seat is vacant without the speaker firstly acknowledging them, can't they?

The judgement must be correct at the first place as this will be inherited to our next generation. If the EC is powerful enough, for what purpose the speaker is there to inform them? Isn't it a joke or what?

http://www.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/15/nation/20090615152713&sec=nation

Published: Monday June 15, 2009 MYT 3:25:00 PM - The Star
Federal Court: EC declares seat vacancies, not speaker

PUTRAJAYA: It is for the Election Commission (EC), and not the Perak state assembly speaker, to declare whether or not a state seat is vacant, the Federal Court ruled in a written judgement made available Monday.

An oral ruling was made April 9.

Federal Court judge Tan Sri Nik Hashim Nik Ab Rahman, in his 20-page judgment, said that under section 12(3) of the Elections Act 1958, the EC would have to establish that a vacancy existed before issuing a writ of by election.

Therefore, the speaker could not interfere with the constitutional duty of the EC to establish whether there was a casual vacancy.

Let hear a comment from the BAR council:

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com.my/index.php/malaysia/29599-bar-slams-federal-court-for-saying-ec-decides-on-vacancies-

Bar slams Federal Court for saying EC decides on vacancies 
By Debra Chong 

KUALA LUMPUR, June 15 – The Federal Court says it is the Election Commission (EC), and not the legislative assembly speaker, who has the right to decide whether or not a seat is vacant, according to its written judgment in the recent Perak case where three state lawmakers sued Speaker V. Sivakumar.

“The Federal Court has set a dangerous precedent,” the Bar Council president told The Malaysian Insider in an immediate comment on the written grounds recently given out.

Based on the ruling, Ragunath Kesavan said, the EC could easily declare a seat vacant and call for a by-election once a lawmaker hands in his resignation letter, whether it is accepted or rejected by the speaker.


New tourist attraction in Terengganu: Collapsed Stadium

In less than 1 year, the Terengganu landmark, which is the new stadium collapsed. Once opened during last year Sukma, the greatest opening ceremony and fireworks are stunning, now, the stadium become not more than the statue and the best thing is, it is now become a place for tourist attraction. This what happen when the money from the oil royalty is being abused and channeled to the wrong people.... believe it, it is a Malaysia Boleh.....