Friday, July 11, 2008
Who sponsor Bala at oversea?
ACA quizzes IGP and AG over Anwar's allegations
Can we believe that the question by ACA to them really based on facts?e.g. (i suspect this is the question - since both of the interviewies still holding their top post)
ACA officer: Tan Sri, err...err.... Tan sri nak minum air? air ape? pukul berapa bertolak tadi? jam tak? rokok? apa chance kita dlm kes anwar ni ye? kita nak habiskan ni pukul berapa ekk? apa kita nak buat lepas ni ye? kalau press tanya nanti, kita nak jawap apa aa? kuih nak? jom, kita pekena kopi kat kafeteria dulu ahh...
Possible or not?
Friday, July 4, 2008
Malaysia Boleh: Statutory Declaration twisted within 24 hours
The Star: 4/7/2008
KUALA LUMPUR: Political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda's private investigator P. Balasubramaniam on Friday retracted the statutory declaration which he made less than 24 hours ago.
In a startling turn of events Balasubramaniam revealed in a second statutory declaration that he wished "to retract the entire contents of my statutory declaration dated July 1 2008. I was compelled to affirm the said statutory declaration under duress".
The document also read that all statements made were inaccurate and not the truth.
A visibly perturbed Balasubramaniam remained mum on Friday when met by pressmen who had rushed to a hotel here where his new lawyer Arulampalam Mariam Pillai accompanied him for the brief press conference.
Private investigator P.Balasubramaniam (left) talking with his new lawyer Arulampalam Arulampalam Mariam Pillai after the press conference Friday where he retracted the earlier statutory declaration, denying that Abdul Razak Baginda said anything to him that linked the Deputy Prime Minister to Mongolian murder victim Altantuya Shaariibuu. - Bernama Dressed in a cap and T-shirt Balasubramaniam refused to answer questions posed to him and left quickly after his lawyer distributed the second statutory declaration to reporters.
Arulampalam also refused to entertain pressmen, giving only a brief statement that his client was under duress and that he was upset.
The new statutory declaration withdrew all statements that Balasubramaniam had revealed to a packed press conference organised by PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim at party headquarters on Thursday.
This included the fact that he had informed police what political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda had purportedly told him prior to Altantuya's murder.
The 10 statements highlighted in the second statutory declaration dated July 4 were:
* At no material time did Razak inform him (Balasubramaniam) that the former was introduced to Altantuya Shaariibuu by a VIP;
* At no material time did Razak inform him that Najib had a sexual relationship with Altantuya and that she was "susceptible to anal intercourse";
* At no material time did Razak inform him that Najib instructed Razak to look after Altantuya as he did not want her to harass him since he (Najib) was the Deputy Prime Minister;
* At no material time did Razak and/or Altantuya inform him that Najib, together with Razak and Altantuya had met and all been together at a dinner in Paris;
* At no material time did Altantuya inform him that she wanted money in the sum of US$500,000 as a commission for a submarine deal she "assisted" with in Paris;
* At no time whatsoever did Razak and/or Altantuya inform him that Najib met with Altantuya in Singapore;
* At no time whatsoever did Altantuya inform him that she wanted Balasubramaniam to arrange to see Najib;
* At no time did he tell the police during the course of their investigations about any relationship between Najib and Altantuya as no such relationship existed to his knowledge;
* At no time did Razak inform him that he had sent Najib an SMS the evening before he (Razak) was arrested; and
* At no time did Razak inform him that Najib has sent him an SMS on the day of his (Razak) arrest to the effect that he was going to see the IGP that day and that the matter should be resolved and for Razak to remain calm.
The subsidy - in layman's term
=====================
A man called Maha owns a farm which can produce 10 apples every day.
He has 5 workers to operate the farm.
Each of them eats 1 apple daily and it is enough to keep them operating
the farm normally.
The remaining 4 apples, the landlord sells them at RM10 each and he
earns
RM40.
He uses the RM25 to improve the farm operation and facilities.
He gives RM2.00 to each of his workers and he keeps the remaining RM5.00
as profit.
Day by day, the farm is well developed and all of the 5 workers are
happy
with the money they can save.
When Maha passed away and there is a new landlord, Abdul comes to
continue
the farm operation.
He says to the workers:" We need to improve the farm quality and
redefine
our way of thinking.
From now on all of you only need to pay RM1.00 for each apple you eat.
It
is very cheap as the price is RM10 each outside the farm."
The workers have no choice but to pay RM1.00 for the apple they eat
daily.
Their earning decrease from RM2.00 to M1.00 per person.
As usual, Abdul sells the 4 apples and he gets RM40. He uses RM25 for
farm
improvement and pays RM10 to his 5 workers. He gets RM5.00 as profit. On
top of that, he gets another RM5.00 from the apples that he sells to his
workers. In total, he gets RM10 as profit every day.
Soon, the apple price increases to RM20 each. The new landlord gets a
higher profit as he gets RM80 for the 4 apples he sells daily.
Then, he decides to give the farming improvement contract to one of his
close friend, Samy. Samy says:"Apple cost naik, improvement cost also
misti naik."
So, the farm improvement cost increases from RM25 to RM50. In actual
fact,
the improvement only cost RM30. The remaining RM20, Abdul and Samy share
evenly among themselves.
Let's calculate how much Abdul gets daily:
RM10 (from farm improvement cost)
RM20 (Net profit by selling 4 apples: [Gross profit, RM80] -
[Improvement
cost, RM50] - [Wages RM10] = RM20)
RM5 (from selling apples to his workers)
In total, Abdul gets RM35 daily compare to RM10 initially when he takes
over the farm from Maha.
His profit increases RM25 and the workers are still getting RM1.00 daily
per person.
The greedy Abdul does not want to stop there.
One day, he says to his fellow workers:" You see ah, the current market
price for one apple is RM20 and you are only paying RM1.
See how lucky you are! I have to SUBSIDY RM19.00 for each of the apple
you
buy and total I need to SUBSIDY RM95.00.
This will greatly burden the farm and we might get bankrupt if we
continue
like this.
In order to avoid bankruptcy, I need to increase the apple price that
you
buy from RM1.00 to RM1.50 and I will bear the remaining RM18.50 per
apple
as my subsidy to you all. "
So, greedy Abdul adds RM2.50 to his current profit and the number
becomes
RM37.50.
After you have read the story, I am sure you have already understood the
meaning of "SUBSIDY" given by the government.
The RM95 subsidy never existed in the first place and so was the RM52
billion fuel subsidy generously "given" by the government
Cutting fuel subsidy is actually just a reason to steal money from our
pocket.
Fitnah
Kalau laporan polis dibuat terhadap PM/TPM itu fitnah... Kalau laporan polis dibuat terhadap penasihat PKR itu betul dan kena siasat... - our PM
Fitnah bermaharajalela – PM (Utusan Malaysia 4 Julai 2008)
KUALA LUMPUR 3 Julai - Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi berkata, terlalu banyak fitnah ditaburkan ketika ini sehingga menimbulkan keresahan di kalangan rakyat malah ia merupakan yang terburuk sepanjang 30 tahun beliau terlibat dalam politik.
Sehubungan itu, Perdana Menteri meminta rakyat supaya jangan panik dan kelam-kabut ekoran pelbagai perkembangan politik kebelakangan ini kerana negara masih berada dalam keadaan yang terkawal.
Do you still remember?
In 1998 saga, Dr. Mahathir did ask DS Anwar Ibrahim to vacate their post for a fair investigation to take place..what happen now? Police report and statutory declaration against IGP, AG and DPM looks like nothing happen. How can BPR and Police Officer investigate this case if their boss is still holding their post and at the same time, these officers need to report their duty to them.. Do you still believe in our system, i.e Police and Judiciary?..Tuan-tuan pikirlah sendiri......
